東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Human-animal relationships- Moral and ethical aspects." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Zoopolis : = a political theory of a...

Donaldson, Sue.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Zoopolis : = a political theory of animal rights /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Zoopolis :/ Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka.
其他題名:	a political theory of animal rights /
作者:	Donaldson, Sue.
其他作者:	Kymlicka, Will.
出版者:	Oxford ;Oxford University Press, : 2013.,
面頁冊數:	vii, 329 p. ;24 cm.
內容註:	Introduction -- Universal basic rights for animals -- Extending animal rights via citizenship theory -- Domesticated animals within animal rights theory -- Domesticated animal citizens -- Wild animal sovereignty -- Liminal animal denizens -- Conclusion.
標題:	Animal rights. -
ISBN:	9780199673018

Zoopolis : = a political theory of animal rights /
Donaldson, Sue.

Zoopolis :a political theory of animal rights /Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka. - Oxford ;Oxford University Press,2013. - vii, 329 p. ;24 cm.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 301-316) and index.

Introduction -- Universal basic rights for animals -- Extending animal rights via citizenship theory -- Domesticated animals within animal rights theory -- Domesticated animal citizens -- Wild animal sovereignty -- Liminal animal denizens -- Conclusion.

Zoopolis offers a new agenda for the theory and practice of animal rights. Most animal rights theory focuses on the intrinsic capacities or interests of animals, and the moral status and moral rights that these intrinsic characteristics give rise to. Zoopolis shifts the debate from the real of moral theory and applied ethics to the realm of political theory, focusing on the relational obligations that arise from the varied ways that animals relate to human societies and institutions. Building on recent developments in the political theory of group-differentiated citizenship, Zoopolis introduces us to the genuine "political animal." It argues that different types of animals stand in different relationships to human political communities. Domesticated animals should be seen as full members of human-animal mixed communities, participating in the cooperative project of shared citizenship. Wilderness animals, by contrast, form their own sovereign communities entitled to protection against colonization, invasion, domination, and other threats to self-determination. "Liminal" animals who are wild but live in the midst of human settlement (such as crows or raccoons) should be seen as "denizens", residents of our societies, but not fully included in rights and responsibilities of citizenship. To all of these animals we owe respect for their basic inviolable rights, but we inevitably and appropriately have very different relations with them, with different types of obligations. Humans and animals are inextricably bound in a complex web of relationships, and Zoopolis offers an original and profoundly affirmative vision of how to ground this complex web of relations on principles of justice and compassion.

ISBN: 9780199673018UK22.99

LCCN: 2012418021Subjects--Topical Terms:

653830
Animal rights.

LC Class. No.: HV4708 / .D665 2013

Dewey Class. No.: 179.3

Zoopolis : = a political theory of animal rights /
LDR:02565cam a2200193 a 4500 001 2228641
005 20210719161603.0
008 210524s2013 enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2012418021
020 $a 9780199673018 $q (pbk.) : $c UK22.99
040 $a DLC $b eng $c DLC
042 $a pcc
050 0 0 $a HV4708 $b .D665 2013
082 0 4 $a 179.3 $2 23
100 1 $a Donaldson, Sue. $3 3476559
245 1 0 $a Zoopolis : $b a political theory of animal rights / $c Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka.
260 # $a Oxford ; $a New York : $b Oxford University Press, $c 2013.
300 $a vii, 329 p. ; $c 24 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. 301-316) and index.
505 0 # $a Introduction -- Universal basic rights for animals -- Extending animal rights via citizenship theory -- Domesticated animals within animal rights theory -- Domesticated animal citizens -- Wild animal sovereignty -- Liminal animal denizens -- Conclusion.
520 # $a Zoopolis offers a new agenda for the theory and practice of animal rights. Most animal rights theory focuses on the intrinsic capacities or interests of animals, and the moral status and moral rights that these intrinsic characteristics give rise to. Zoopolis shifts the debate from the real of moral theory and applied ethics to the realm of political theory, focusing on the relational obligations that arise from the varied ways that animals relate to human societies and institutions. Building on recent developments in the political theory of group-differentiated citizenship, Zoopolis introduces us to the genuine "political animal." It argues that different types of animals stand in different relationships to human political communities. Domesticated animals should be seen as full members of human-animal mixed communities, participating in the cooperative project of shared citizenship. Wilderness animals, by contrast, form their own sovereign communities entitled to protection against colonization, invasion, domination, and other threats to self-determination. "Liminal" animals who are wild but live in the midst of human settlement (such as crows or raccoons) should be seen as "denizens", residents of our societies, but not fully included in rights and responsibilities of citizenship. To all of these animals we owe respect for their basic inviolable rights, but we inevitably and appropriately have very different relations with them, with different types of obligations. Humans and animals are inextricably bound in a complex web of relationships, and Zoopolis offers an original and profoundly affirmative vision of how to ground this complex web of relations on principles of justice and compassion.
650 # 0 $a Animal rights. $3 653830
650 # 0 $a Human-animal relationships $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 1599167
700 1 # $a Kymlicka, Will. $3 517420