東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"International Criminal Law." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Histories written by international c...

Zammit Borda, Aldo.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Histories written by international criminal courts and tribunals = developing a responsible history framework /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Histories written by international criminal courts and tribunals/ by Aldo Zammit Borda.
其他題名:	developing a responsible history framework /
作者:	Zammit Borda, Aldo.
出版者:	The Hague :T.M.C. Asser Press : : 2021.,
面頁冊數:	xxiii, 258 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Approaches to the History-Writing Function in International Criminal Adjudication -- Chapter 3. The Individual-Centred Lens -- Chapter 4. The Crime-Driven Lens -- Chapter 5. The Law-Affirming Lens -- Chapter 6. The Distinctive Approaches Of History And Law -- Chapter 7. Aiming Towards Responsible History in International Criminal Adjudication -- Chapter 8. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	International criminal law - History. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-427-3
ISBN:	9789462654273

Histories written by international criminal courts and tribunals = developing a responsible history framework /
Zammit Borda, Aldo.

Histories written by international criminal courts and tribunalsdeveloping a responsible history framework /[electronic resource] :by Aldo Zammit Borda. - The Hague :T.M.C. Asser Press :2021. - xxiii, 258 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - International criminal justice series,v.262352-6718 ;. - International criminal justice series ;v.26..

Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Approaches to the History-Writing Function in International Criminal Adjudication -- Chapter 3. The Individual-Centred Lens -- Chapter 4. The Crime-Driven Lens -- Chapter 5. The Law-Affirming Lens -- Chapter 6. The Distinctive Approaches Of History And Law -- Chapter 7. Aiming Towards Responsible History in International Criminal Adjudication -- Chapter 8. Conclusion.

This book argues for a more moderate approach to history-writing in international criminal adjudication by articulating the elements of a "responsible history" normative framework. The question of whether international criminal courts and tribunals (ICTs) ought to write historical narratives has gained renewed relevance in the context of the recent turn to history in international criminal law, the growing attention to the historical legacies of the ad hoc Tribunals and the minimal attention paid to historical context in the first judgment of the International Criminal Court. The starting point for this discussion is that, in cases of mass atrocities, prosecutors and judges are inevitably understood to be engaged in writing history and influencing collective memory, whether or not they so intend. Therefore, while writing history is an inescapable feature of ICTs, there is still today significant lack of consensus over the proper place of this function. Since Hannah Arendt articulated her doctrine of strict legality, in response to the prosecutor's expansive didactic approach in Eichmann, the legal debate on the subject has been largely polarised between restrictive and expansive approaches to history-writing in mass atrocity trials. What has been noticeably missing from this debate is the middle ground. The contribution this book seeks to make is precisely to articulate a framework that occupies that ground. The book asks: what are the lenses through which judges of ICTs interpret historical events and what kind of histories do ICTs write? and what kinds of histories should ICTs produce? Its arguments for a more moderate approach to history-writing are based on three distinct, but interrelated reasons: (1) Truth and Justice; (2) Right to Truth; and (3) Legal Epistemology. Different target audiences may benefit from this book. Court officials and legal practitioners may find the normative framework developed herein useful in addressing the tensions between the competing objectives of ICTs and, in particular, in assessing the value of the history-writing function. Lawyers, historians and other academics may also find the analysis of the strengths, constraints and blind spots of the historical narratives written by ICTs interesting. This issue is particularly timely in view of current debates on the legacies of ICTs. Aldo Zammit Borda is Director of the Centre for Access to Justice and Inclusion at Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

ISBN: 9789462654273

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-94-6265-427-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3242331
International criminal law
--History.

LC Class. No.: KZ7050 / .Z36 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 345

Histories written by international criminal courts and tribunals = developing a responsible history framework /
LDR:03999nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2236963
003 DE-He213
005 20201218134845.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 211111s2021 ne s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789462654273 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789462654266 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-94-6265-427-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-94-6265-427-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KZ7050 $b .Z36 2021
072 7 $a LBBZ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBZ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 345 $2 23
090 $a KZ7050 $b .Z24 2021
100 1 $a Zammit Borda, Aldo. $3 3488803
245 1 0 $a Histories written by international criminal courts and tribunals $h [electronic resource] : $b developing a responsible history framework / $c by Aldo Zammit Borda.
260 $a The Hague : $b T.M.C. Asser Press : $b Imprint: T.M.C. Asser Press, $c 2021.
300 $a xxiii, 258 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a International criminal justice series, $x 2352-6718 ; $v v.26
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Approaches to the History-Writing Function in International Criminal Adjudication -- Chapter 3. The Individual-Centred Lens -- Chapter 4. The Crime-Driven Lens -- Chapter 5. The Law-Affirming Lens -- Chapter 6. The Distinctive Approaches Of History And Law -- Chapter 7. Aiming Towards Responsible History in International Criminal Adjudication -- Chapter 8. Conclusion.
520 $a This book argues for a more moderate approach to history-writing in international criminal adjudication by articulating the elements of a "responsible history" normative framework. The question of whether international criminal courts and tribunals (ICTs) ought to write historical narratives has gained renewed relevance in the context of the recent turn to history in international criminal law, the growing attention to the historical legacies of the ad hoc Tribunals and the minimal attention paid to historical context in the first judgment of the International Criminal Court. The starting point for this discussion is that, in cases of mass atrocities, prosecutors and judges are inevitably understood to be engaged in writing history and influencing collective memory, whether or not they so intend. Therefore, while writing history is an inescapable feature of ICTs, there is still today significant lack of consensus over the proper place of this function. Since Hannah Arendt articulated her doctrine of strict legality, in response to the prosecutor's expansive didactic approach in Eichmann, the legal debate on the subject has been largely polarised between restrictive and expansive approaches to history-writing in mass atrocity trials. What has been noticeably missing from this debate is the middle ground. The contribution this book seeks to make is precisely to articulate a framework that occupies that ground. The book asks: what are the lenses through which judges of ICTs interpret historical events and what kind of histories do ICTs write? and what kinds of histories should ICTs produce? Its arguments for a more moderate approach to history-writing are based on three distinct, but interrelated reasons: (1) Truth and Justice; (2) Right to Truth; and (3) Legal Epistemology. Different target audiences may benefit from this book. Court officials and legal practitioners may find the normative framework developed herein useful in addressing the tensions between the competing objectives of ICTs and, in particular, in assessing the value of the history-writing function. Lawyers, historians and other academics may also find the analysis of the strengths, constraints and blind spots of the historical narratives written by ICTs interesting. This issue is particularly timely in view of current debates on the legacies of ICTs. Aldo Zammit Borda is Director of the Centre for Access to Justice and Inclusion at Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
650 0 $a International criminal law $x History. $3 3242331
650 1 4 $a International Criminal Law. $3 1566602
650 2 4 $a Public International Law. $3 1566061
650 2 4 $a International Humanitarian Law, Law of Armed Conflict. $3 1566603
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a International criminal justice series ; $v v.26. $3 3488804
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-427-3
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)