東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Middle school education." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Framework for Deliberate Practice:...

Palermo, Corey John.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Framework for Deliberate Practice: Self-Regulated Strategy Development and an Automated Writing Evaluation Program.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Framework for Deliberate Practice: Self-Regulated Strategy Development and an Automated Writing Evaluation Program./
作者:	Palermo, Corey John.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	248 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-10A(E).
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10610664
ISBN:	9781369855470

A Framework for Deliberate Practice: Self-Regulated Strategy Development and an Automated Writing Evaluation Program.
Palermo, Corey John.

A Framework for Deliberate Practice: Self-Regulated Strategy Development and an Automated Writing Evaluation Program. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 248 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2017.

Process-based approaches to writing tend to overlook the self-regulatory skills and motivational beliefs required for proficient writing (Harris, Santangelo, & Graham, 2008) and do not provide the support many students need to develop into effective writers (Graham, Harris, & Mason, 2005; Harris, Graham, & Mason, 2006). Additionally, restricted writing opportunities preclude the sustained deliberate practice students need to develop expertise in writing (Kellogg & Whiteford, 2009). This study examined an intervention that incorporated the self-regulated strategy development model (SRSD, Graham & Harris, 1993) with the automated writing evaluation (AWE) program NC Write. An embedded quasi-experimental mixed methods design was used to determine the impact of the intervention on students' argumentative writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy. Middle school students (N=829) participated in one of three conditions: NC Write + traditional writing instruction, NC Write + SRSD instruction, or a comparison condition.

ISBN: 9781369855470Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.

A Framework for Deliberate Practice: Self-Regulated Strategy Development and an Automated Writing Evaluation Program.
LDR:04589nmm a2200325 4500 001 2124397
005 20171030105231.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369855470
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10610664
035 $a AAI10610664
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Palermo, Corey John. $3 3286397
245 1 2 $a A Framework for Deliberate Practice: Self-Regulated Strategy Development and an Automated Writing Evaluation Program.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 248 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Margareta Thomson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2017.
520 $a Process-based approaches to writing tend to overlook the self-regulatory skills and motivational beliefs required for proficient writing (Harris, Santangelo, & Graham, 2008) and do not provide the support many students need to develop into effective writers (Graham, Harris, & Mason, 2005; Harris, Graham, & Mason, 2006). Additionally, restricted writing opportunities preclude the sustained deliberate practice students need to develop expertise in writing (Kellogg & Whiteford, 2009). This study examined an intervention that incorporated the self-regulated strategy development model (SRSD, Graham & Harris, 1993) with the automated writing evaluation (AWE) program NC Write. An embedded quasi-experimental mixed methods design was used to determine the impact of the intervention on students' argumentative writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy. Middle school students (N=829) participated in one of three conditions: NC Write + traditional writing instruction, NC Write + SRSD instruction, or a comparison condition.
520 $a Results of multi-level models that controlled for pretest performance and predicted posttest performance averaging across students and within teachers showed that students in the NC Write + SRSD instruction condition produced posttest essays that were of a higher quality, longer, and included more basic elements of argumentative essays than students in the other two conditions. Students in the NC Write + traditional writing instruction condition produced higher-quality essays than students in the comparison condition at posttest. Students in the NC Write + SRSD instruction condition identified more essay elements at posttest, though there were no between-condition differences in writing knowledge of substantive processes or in students' writing self-efficacy at posttest.
520 $a Additional multi-level models were specified to include all essays written by treatment condition students and examine the shape of growth in writing performance. Results showed that students' growth in writing quality, essay length, and essay elements was best represented by a quadratic growth model. On average, students' growth in writing performance reached a plateau following the fourth essay written during the intervention. Differences in rates of change and deceleration in writing quality, essay length, and essay elements were not significantly different between the two treatment conditions.
520 $a Survey results showed students and teachers held generally favorable opinions of NC Write. Interview results determined that NC Write as well as the overall writing intervention had acceptable social validity. Qualitative data analysis revealed that NC Write provided a framework for deliberate writing practice. In this framework students' growth in writing performance is supported by a cycle of learning, practice, and feedback. NC Write enabled deliberate practice by affording writing quality feedback, efficiency, and evidence of growth, and supporting teachers' writing instruction and students' intrinsic motivation. Limitations of the framework included some aspects of feedback, limited lesson data, and lack of a plagiarism scanner in NC Write. Implications from these findings support integrating SRSD instruction with an AWE program to support teacher implementation of the SRSD model and more efficiently provide students with the strategy instruction, practice opportunities, and feedback needed to develop proficiency in writing. Recommendations are provided for AWE programs to better support students' maintenance of writing quality growth.
590 $a School code: 0155.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Middle school education. $3 969762
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0450
710 2 $a North Carolina State University. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 2095182
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-10A(E).
790 $a 0155
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10610664