東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Patent Law." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Should business methods be patentabl...

Apple, Kirsten.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Should business methods be patentable? Understanding the impact on society of business method patents.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Should business methods be patentable? Understanding the impact on society of business method patents./
作者:	Apple, Kirsten.
面頁冊數:	119 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-06A(E).
標題:	Business Administration, Entrepreneurship. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3611768
ISBN:	9781303727610

Should business methods be patentable? Understanding the impact on society of business method patents.
Apple, Kirsten.

Should business methods be patentable? Understanding the impact on society of business method patents. - 119 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2013.

Patents have been an accepted method of encouraging research and development. In the recent past "the scope of technologies that can be patented has been increased to include, among other things, gene sequences, computer programs and methods of doing business (Hunt and Bessen 2004)." Business Methods patents have witnessed very rapid growth since the 1998 State Street case (149 F.3d 1368, 1998) outcome which held that there is no patentable subject matter exception for method of doing business (Allison and Hunter 2006). In other words, business methods are now considered patentable subject matter. This paper examines, whether or not there has been a positive impact in innovation, in particular from the Banking industry, which prior to the State Street Bank case was more restricted from obtaining patents for internal banking process innovations. The hypothesis of this dissertation is that business methods would have results that are similar to the Bessen and Hunt (2007) software study which found that software patents were a substitute for R&D; and contradicted the popular belief of incentive theory. This empirical work in the area of business method patents is fundamental to understanding this new area of patenting.

ISBN: 9781303727610Subjects--Topical Terms:

1026793
Business Administration, Entrepreneurship.

Should business methods be patentable? Understanding the impact on society of business method patents.
LDR:02156nam a2200289 4500 001 1964930
005 20141013105148.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303727610
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3611768
035 $a AAI3611768
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Apple, Kirsten. $3 2101486
245 1 0 $a Should business methods be patentable? Understanding the impact on society of business method patents.
300 $a 119 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Roger Stough.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2013.
520 $a Patents have been an accepted method of encouraging research and development. In the recent past "the scope of technologies that can be patented has been increased to include, among other things, gene sequences, computer programs and methods of doing business (Hunt and Bessen 2004)." Business Methods patents have witnessed very rapid growth since the 1998 State Street case (149 F.3d 1368, 1998) outcome which held that there is no patentable subject matter exception for method of doing business (Allison and Hunter 2006). In other words, business methods are now considered patentable subject matter. This paper examines, whether or not there has been a positive impact in innovation, in particular from the Banking industry, which prior to the State Street Bank case was more restricted from obtaining patents for internal banking process innovations. The hypothesis of this dissertation is that business methods would have results that are similar to the Bessen and Hunt (2007) software study which found that software patents were a substitute for R&D; and contradicted the popular belief of incentive theory. This empirical work in the area of business method patents is fundamental to understanding this new area of patenting.
590 $a School code: 0883.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Entrepreneurship. $3 1026793
650 4 $a Patent Law. $3 1679968
650 4 $a Economics, Finance. $3 626650
690 $a 0429
690 $a 0562
690 $a 0508
710 2 $a George Mason University. $b Public Policy. $3 2093748
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-06A(E).
790 $a 0883
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3611768