東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Research methodology." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Legal Clashes and Uncertainties in t...

Oswald, Marion.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Legal Clashes and Uncertainties in the Digital Age, with a Particular Focus on the Public Sector - Researching Across Boundaries.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Legal Clashes and Uncertainties in the Digital Age, with a Particular Focus on the Public Sector - Researching Across Boundaries./
作者:	Oswald, Marion.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	44 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-11B.
標題:	Privacy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28433330
ISBN:	9798728298564

Legal Clashes and Uncertainties in the Digital Age, with a Particular Focus on the Public Sector - Researching Across Boundaries.
Oswald, Marion.

Legal Clashes and Uncertainties in the Digital Age, with a Particular Focus on the Public Sector - Researching Across Boundaries. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 44 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The last decade has seen digital technologies become ubiquitous and integrated into everyday life. The Work spans eight years of this period and addresses several legal challenges, clashes and uncertainties that have arisen as a result, particularly in respect of the use of digital technologies by public sector bodies. In this thesis commentary, the Work is categorised by reference to three sub-themes: i) digital processing of information, legal conflicts and harms; ii) questions around data sharing and trust; iii) AI and algorithmic analysis in policing and the legal and policy framework. The commentary discusses how the Work, as an integrated whole, represents an independent and original contribution to Cyberlaw and has championed and proven the value of an approach that is 'interdisciplinary' both within the legal field and outside of it. Digital technologies do not exist in a vacuum. Research across legal and other boundaries, as demonstrated by the Work, is necessary to address the impact on interlocking legal, operational and policy systems, and therefore to support convincing recommendations for change. Mixed-methodologies underpin the Work, combining doctrinal and law-in-context/law-in-action approaches with empirical research, historical and comparative methods, freedom of information request methods and/or participatory research, in order to deepen understanding of the issues identified and explored from different perspectives. These methodologies, combined with interdisciplinary working, could be described as an 'in-house' approach to legal research, defined by practical knowledge and understanding of an operational context, awareness of relevant legal frameworks, translation of theoretical concepts, and the independence of thought necessary for pragmatic conclusions and recommendations. The Work has informed further academic investigation, both by the author and others, and led to policy and operational developments. Various new avenues of research are suggested by Work as we continue to see misuses of the digital person, the siloing of knowledge by commercial bodies and the side-lining of the law in favour of en vogue self-regulatory and 'ethical' approaches for the oversight of algorithm-assisted public sector decision-making.

ISBN: 9798728298564Subjects--Topical Terms:

528582
Privacy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Digital technologies

Legal Clashes and Uncertainties in the Digital Age, with a Particular Focus on the Public Sector - Researching Across Boundaries.
LDR:03509nmm a2200361 4500 001 2283138
005 20211022115652.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798728298564
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28433330
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Northumbria_45359
035 $a AAI28433330
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Oswald, Marion. $3 3562054
245 1 0 $a Legal Clashes and Uncertainties in the Digital Age, with a Particular Focus on the Public Sector - Researching Across Boundaries.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 44 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Newman, Chris;Mccartney, Carole.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The last decade has seen digital technologies become ubiquitous and integrated into everyday life. The Work spans eight years of this period and addresses several legal challenges, clashes and uncertainties that have arisen as a result, particularly in respect of the use of digital technologies by public sector bodies. In this thesis commentary, the Work is categorised by reference to three sub-themes: i) digital processing of information, legal conflicts and harms; ii) questions around data sharing and trust; iii) AI and algorithmic analysis in policing and the legal and policy framework. The commentary discusses how the Work, as an integrated whole, represents an independent and original contribution to Cyberlaw and has championed and proven the value of an approach that is 'interdisciplinary' both within the legal field and outside of it. Digital technologies do not exist in a vacuum. Research across legal and other boundaries, as demonstrated by the Work, is necessary to address the impact on interlocking legal, operational and policy systems, and therefore to support convincing recommendations for change. Mixed-methodologies underpin the Work, combining doctrinal and law-in-context/law-in-action approaches with empirical research, historical and comparative methods, freedom of information request methods and/or participatory research, in order to deepen understanding of the issues identified and explored from different perspectives. These methodologies, combined with interdisciplinary working, could be described as an 'in-house' approach to legal research, defined by practical knowledge and understanding of an operational context, awareness of relevant legal frameworks, translation of theoretical concepts, and the independence of thought necessary for pragmatic conclusions and recommendations. The Work has informed further academic investigation, both by the author and others, and led to policy and operational developments. Various new avenues of research are suggested by Work as we continue to see misuses of the digital person, the siloing of knowledge by commercial bodies and the side-lining of the law in favour of en vogue self-regulatory and 'ethical' approaches for the oversight of algorithm-assisted public sector decision-making.
590 $a School code: 5060.
650 4 $a Privacy. $3 528582
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Artificial intelligence. $3 516317
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Research methodology. $3 3559994
650 4 $a Horses. $3 527157
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
653 $a Digital technologies
653 $a Data sharing
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0800
710 2 $a University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom). $3 3545556
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-11B.
790 $a 5060
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28433330