東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Ways to be blameworthy : = rightness...

Mason, Elinor.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ways to be blameworthy : = rightness, wrongness, and responsibility /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ways to be blameworthy :/ Elinor Mason.
其他題名:	rightness, wrongness, and responsibility /
作者:	Mason, Elinor.
出版者:	Oxford, United Kingdom :Oxford University Press, : c2019.,
面頁冊數:	237 p. ;23 cm.
標題:	Blame. -
ISBN:	9780198833604 (hbk.) :

Ways to be blameworthy : = rightness, wrongness, and responsibility /
Mason, Elinor.

Ways to be blameworthy :rightness, wrongness, and responsibility /Elinor Mason. - First ed. - Oxford, United Kingdom :Oxford University Press,c2019. - 237 p. ;23 cm.

Includes bibliographical references (p. [215]-227) and index.

There must be some connection between our deontic notions, rightness and wrongness, and our responsibility notions, praise- and blameworthiness. Yet traditional approaches to each set of concepts tend to take the other set for granted. This book takes an integrated approach to these questions, drawing on both ethics and responsibility theory, and thereby illuminating both sets of concepts. Elinor Mason describes this as 'normative responsibility theory': the primary aim is not to give an account of the conditions of agency, but to give an account of what sort of wrong action makes blame fitting. She presents a pluralistic view of both obligation and blameworthiness, identifying three different ways to be blameworthy, corresponding to different ways of acting wrongly. First, ordinary blameworthiness is essentially connected to subjective wrongness, to acting wrongly by one's own lights. Subjective obligation, and ordinary blame, apply only to those who are within our moral community, who understand and share our value system. By contrast, detached blame can apply even when the agent is outside our moral community, and has no sense that her act is morally wrong. In detached blame, the blame rather than the lameworthiness is fundamental. Finally, agents can take responsibility for some inadvertent wrongs, and thus become responsible. This third sort of blameworthiness, 'extended blameworthiness', applies when the agent understands the objective wrongness of her act, but has no bad will. In such cases, the social context may be such that the agent should take responsibility, and accept ordinary blame from the wronged party.

ISBN: 9780198833604 (hbk.) :GBP50.00Subjects--Topical Terms:

721858
Blame.

LC Class. No.: BJ1451 / .M37 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 170

Ways to be blameworthy : = rightness, wrongness, and responsibility /
LDR:02477cam 2200241 a 4500 001 2173096
008 190910s2019 enk b 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9780198833604 (hbk.) : $c GBP50.00
020 $a 9780191872037 $q (ebk.)
020 $a 9780192570208 $q (ebk.)
020 $a 0191872032 $q (ebk.)
020 $a 019257020X $q (ebk.)
020 $a 0198833601 (hbk.)
035 $a (OCoLC)1086210690 $z (OCoLC)1086484346
040 $a N$T $b eng $e aacr2 $e pn $c N$T $d EBLCP $d YDX $d OCLCF $d UKOUP $d LGG $d YDXIT $d OH1
050 # 4 $a BJ1451 $b .M37 2019
082 0 4 $a 170 $2 23
082 0 4 $a 190 $2 22
100 1 $a Mason, Elinor. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr00022360. $3 3376579
245 1 0 $a Ways to be blameworthy : $b rightness, wrongness, and responsibility / $c Elinor Mason.
250 $a First ed.
260 # $a Oxford, United Kingdom : $b Oxford University Press, $c c2019.
300 $a 237 p. ; $c 23 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. [215]-227) and index.
520 8 $a There must be some connection between our deontic notions, rightness and wrongness, and our responsibility notions, praise- and blameworthiness. Yet traditional approaches to each set of concepts tend to take the other set for granted. This book takes an integrated approach to these questions, drawing on both ethics and responsibility theory, and thereby illuminating both sets of concepts. Elinor Mason describes this as 'normative responsibility theory': the primary aim is not to give an account of the conditions of agency, but to give an account of what sort of wrong action makes blame fitting. She presents a pluralistic view of both obligation and blameworthiness, identifying three different ways to be blameworthy, corresponding to different ways of acting wrongly. First, ordinary blameworthiness is essentially connected to subjective wrongness, to acting wrongly by one's own lights. Subjective obligation, and ordinary blame, apply only to those who are within our moral community, who understand and share our value system. By contrast, detached blame can apply even when the agent is outside our moral community, and has no sense that her act is morally wrong. In detached blame, the blame rather than the lameworthiness is fundamental. Finally, agents can take responsibility for some inadvertent wrongs, and thus become responsible. This third sort of blameworthiness, 'extended blameworthiness', applies when the agent understands the objective wrongness of her act, but has no bad will. In such cases, the social context may be such that the agent should take responsibility, and accept ordinary blame from the wronged party.
650 # 0 $a Blame. $3 721858
650 # 0 $a Right and wrong. $3 586409