東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Research design in clinical psychology /

Kazdin, Alan E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Research design in clinical psychology /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Research design in clinical psychology // Alan E Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut.
作者:	Kazdin, Alan E.
出版者:	Cambridge, UK ;Cambridge University Press, : c2022.,
面頁冊數:	xxiii, 558 p. :col. ill. ;28 cm.
附註:	Originally published, 2017.
標題:	Clinical psychology - Research -
ISBN:	9781108995214

Research design in clinical psychology /
Kazdin, Alan E.

Research design in clinical psychology /Alan E Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut. - 5th ed. - Cambridge, UK ;Cambridge University Press,c2022. - xxiii, 558 p. :col. ill. ;28 cm.

Originally published, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

"There are many sciences, and it would be valuable, if not essential, to have the principles and practices consistent. We would not want the criteria for what "counts" as knowledge to vary as a function of quite different ways of going about obtaining that knowledge. This consistency is more important than ever because much of research on a given topic involves the collaboration of scientists from many different fields to address a question. They must speak the same language, share the same underlying values about how to obtain knowledge, and agree on procedures and practices (e.g., statistical evaluation, reporting data that do and do not support a particular hypothesis). Consistency also is critical within any given scientific discipline. For a given science (e.g., psychology), we would want consistency throughout the world in what the standards are for obtaining scientific knowledge- the accumulation of knowledge from all individuals in a given field requires this level of consistency. Science "says" essentially, these are our goals (e.g., describe, understand, explain, intervene where needed, possible, and desirable) and these are our means (use of theory, methodology, guiding concepts, replication of results). Science is hardly a "game" because so many of the tasks we have are serious. Yet there are rules, and there are enormous benefits from following them among all sciences and scientists"--

ISBN: 9781108995214UK69.99

LCCN: 2021025497Subjects--Topical Terms:

568157
Clinical psychology
--Research

LC Class. No.: BF76.5 / .K32 2022

Dewey Class. No.: 616.890072

Research design in clinical psychology /
LDR:02306cam a2200241 a 4500 001 2287762
008 220906r20222017enka b 001 0 eng d
010 $a 2021025497
020 $a 9781108995214 $q (pbk.) : $c UK69.99
020 $a 1108995217 $q (pbk.)
035 $a (OCoLC)1253438247
035 $a .b93577874
040 $a DLC $b eng $e aacr2 $c DLC $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d QGQ $d OSU $d UtOrBLW
042 $a pcc
050 # 4 $a BF76.5 $b .K32 2022
082 0 0 $a 616.890072 $2 23
100 1 $a Kazdin, Alan E. $3 536536
245 1 0 $a Research design in clinical psychology / $c Alan E Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut.
250 $a 5th ed.
260 # $a Cambridge, UK ; $a New York, NY : $b Cambridge University Press, $c c2022.
300 $a xxiii, 558 p. : $b col. ill. ; $c 28 cm.
500 $a Originally published, 2017.
500 $a "Fifth edition reissued by Cambridge University Press 2022"--Title page verso.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
520 # $a "There are many sciences, and it would be valuable, if not essential, to have the principles and practices consistent. We would not want the criteria for what "counts" as knowledge to vary as a function of quite different ways of going about obtaining that knowledge. This consistency is more important than ever because much of research on a given topic involves the collaboration of scientists from many different fields to address a question. They must speak the same language, share the same underlying values about how to obtain knowledge, and agree on procedures and practices (e.g., statistical evaluation, reporting data that do and do not support a particular hypothesis). Consistency also is critical within any given scientific discipline. For a given science (e.g., psychology), we would want consistency throughout the world in what the standards are for obtaining scientific knowledge- the accumulation of knowledge from all individuals in a given field requires this level of consistency. Science "says" essentially, these are our goals (e.g., describe, understand, explain, intervene where needed, possible, and desirable) and these are our means (use of theory, methodology, guiding concepts, replication of results). Science is hardly a "game" because so many of the tasks we have are serious. Yet there are rules, and there are enormous benefits from following them among all sciences and scientists"-- $c Provided by publisher.
650 # 0 $a Clinical psychology $x Research $x Methodology. $3 568157